MINUTES OF THE
FACULTY SENATE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 2013
Mason Hall D101 (Provost’s Conference Room) 1:00
– 2:30 p.m.
Senators Present: Jim Bennett, Charlene Douglas, Star Muir, Peter
Pober, Joe Scimecca, Suzanne Scott, Peter Stearns, Susan Trencher.
I. Approval of Minutes of August 19, 2013: The minutes were
approved as amended:
II.
Announcements: “INTO”, “CAS” was changed to “CHSS” in the last
sentence.
VI. New
Business, Updates and Discussion:
Provost Search Committee, “Nutter” was changed to “Neville” in the second
sentence.
We will present the
proposed academic calendar for AY 17-18 for approval at the next Faculty Senate
meeting. General concerns expressed
included proximity of final exam schedule to Christmas and the extension of
summer school term from five to six weeks.
B. Budget and
Resources – no report.
Monique Van Hoek (COS)
is nominated to serve on the Salary Equity Study Committee. Kumar Mehta (SOM) is nominated to serve as
Faculty Senate representative to the University Smoking Policy Working Group.
External Academic
Relations Committee Charge: Suggestion made to include Mark Smith, new
Director of State Government Affairs, as an ex-officio member of the
committee. Provost Stearns thinks this
is sensible, and suggests you run past Mark Smith and Paul Etherton(sp).
Faculty Senators 2013-14 pending: elected
Senator from S-CAR
University Standing Committee Chairs Elected: Academic Appeals - Michael Hurley (CHSS); Admissions - Betsy DeMulder (CEHD); Grievance
- Paul Houser (COS); Faculty Handbook – Suzanne Slayden (COS); Minority and
Diversity Issues - Nirup Menon (SOM); NIAL - Nada Dabbagh (CEHD); Technology
Policy - Stanley Zoltek (COS); Writing
Across the Curriculum - Stanley Zoltek (COS).
University Standing Committee Chairs election pending: Academic Initiatives, Effective Teaching,
External Academic Relations, Salary Equity Study, UPTRAC,
Resolution in
Support of Providing Benefits for Same Sex Partners – Suzanne Scott distributed a new draft. Input was received from Ric Chollar (Associate Director for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual,
Transgender, Queer and Questioning (LGBTQ) Resources), Mark Uhen (current
chair of Faculty LGBTQ) and Corey Jackson (Vice President, Compliance, Diversity and
Ethics, Equity and Diversity Services). Changes suggested included replacing “Mason’s
family-friendly environment” to “Mason’s community”. Even though sexuality is a protected status
at GMU, it is not recognized by the state of Virginia. What is the relationship between Virginia law
and what the university can do? The IRS
now recognizes same sex couples who marry in one jurisdiction and move to
another jurisdiction which does not recognize same sex marriage. Other suggested edits were incorporated and
will be included on the October 9th meeting agenda.
Masonvale: A 501c3,
not a University entity, we receive income/funding on a regular basis. Masonvale
was not set up as a long-term residence, more as a recruiting tool. A disabled faculty member has lived there for
three years, with a one-year extension. Is
this a Faculty Senate issue? Several
Executive Committee members recalled vote by Faculty Senate years ago to
approve it as specifically used by faculty, recruitment potential. In the first few years, they took in all
kinds of people (different layers of eligibility); graduate students included
in the mix. Contracts did not include
notice of three years’ residency. Some
faculty were recruited and told they could live there without informing them of
time limit. Not unreasonable to make
exception when someone of long service to the university and is disabled, not
right to take person out of Masonvale.
Suggestion made to have a faculty member who lives at Masonvale serve on
the Board (appointed by President Cabrera), also to find out if there is a
protocol to address exceptions. Provost
Stearns will soon rotate off the Board, to strongly suggest this to President
Cabrera.
Provost Search: The
first meeting of the Provost Search Committee will take place this week. After some discussion, the Executive
Committee agreed to distribute an email to all faculty requesting input on the
five most important criteria in the search for a Provost as soon as possible.(an email was distributed October 2nd
subsequent to the first Provost Search Committee meeting October 1st). Faculty need to feel we are soliciting
feedback from them.
Faculty Staff
Enrichment Day: We received an invitation to participate this
year (November 5th). Peter
Pober has participated in the past, but was not available to attend this year. About 70% participants are staff. In response to concerns expressed about HR
involvement not addressing concerns on the academic side, he noted that
lectures and discussions in the past were not an attempt to present HR
perspectives. Many people give discussions,
not trying to be hegemonic in their interpretations. He suggested we pursue discussion of shared
governance issues with staff senate representatives, particularly in view of
recent departure of Joey Carls (Staff Senate Chair) this summer.
(Issue subsequently removed from October 9th FS Meeting
agenda as Staff Senate Vice Chair Rick Holt informed
us agenda finalized).
“INTO:” Provost Stearns reported the negotiations with
INTO are continuing, and believes we will have a favorable framework. Feedback from open forum
was generally neutral; we may have another open forum before approval. He anticipates
presentation to the BOV in December.
Faculty
Handbook/BOV: Provost Stearns anticipates a comment at the
APDUC meeting on changes favorably received by Faculty Handbook Committee; not
a final product, would need approval by Faculty Senate before December BOV meeting.
Graduate Council/Process: The
Graduate Council approved a new nine-year limit on PhDs. Role of the Faculty Senate
(via the Academic Policies Committee) to vet these decisions, not yet presented
to the Faculty Senate. To ask
Cody Edwards (former Faculty Senator/ served as a member of the Academic
Policies Committee, now Associate Provost for Undergraduate Education) for
exact wording. Some units may favor
this, some may oppose. Lack of communication and variability among units to finance
graduate degrees. Larger issue
not the number of years, but who approves this as this goes across units? Needs to go to Faculty
Senate for action.
Respectfully
submitted,
Meg Caniano
Faculty Senate clerk
Attachment A