Agenda for the
Faculty Senate Meeting
December 2, 2009
Room B113,
Robinson Hall
3:00
- 4:15 p m.
II.
Approval of the Minutes of September 16, 2009
III.
Announcements
President Merten
IV.
Unfinished Business
Budget and Resources
Nominations
Deborah Boehm-Davis, Kelly Dunne, Penny Earley (Provost's Appointee), Stephen Farnsworth, Karl Fryxell, and Frank Philpot are nominated to serve on the External Academic Relations Committee.
Organization and Operations
Report from the committee – Fall 2009 Attachment B
VI.
Remarks for the Good of the General Faculty
ATTACHMENT A
OPERATIONS AND ORGANIZATIONS
Draft Resolution to Ensure
Faculty Senate Bylaws and Charter Consistency
Whereas the responsibilities of the Faculty Senate in Section II.A.1 of the Faculty Senate Charter indicate that the Senate shall have “the fundamental general responsibility to speak and act for the General Faculty on matters affecting the University as a whole;” and
Whereas the Charter indicates in Section II.A.2 that the Faculty Senate, “on behalf of the general faculty, shall have the particular responsibility to formulate proposals on those matters affecting the welfare of the university as a whole,” which will constitute the “primary advice to the administration;” and
Whereas the Charter further specifies that on “matters affecting the entire faculty and transcending collegiate unit boundaries, the Senate shall be the primary faculty representative in consultation with the central administration and the President;” and
Whereas the Bylaws in Article I, Section 1 specify that the
“membership of the George Mason Faculty Senate and eligibility to vote therein
shall be as prescribed by the Charter,” yet there is no prescription of
voting eligibility in any section or clause of the Charter; and
Whereas administrators are welcomed and encouraged to participate in dialog and consultation with and as members of the Faculty Senate, yet should not be representing the faculty voice on matters of importance to the faculty and the University;
Be it resolved:
That Article I, Section I of the Bylaws of the Faculty Senate should be amended to strike “and eligibility to vote therein” and add the following sentence at the end: “Eligibility to vote on matters before the Faculty Senate shall be limited to duly elected faculty members of the Faculty Senate.
November 23, 2009
To: The Faculty Senate
From: The Academic Initiatives Committee
Jim Bennett (CHSS), Chair
Elizabeth Chong (CHHS)
Bob Ehrlich (COS)
Bob Johnston (SOM)
Terry Zawacki (CHSS)
Subj: Committee
Report for Fall 2009
1.0 Introduction
The Charge of the Academic
Initiatives Committee requires a report to the Senate each semester. In
conducting its business, the Committee has met four times thus far this
semester: September 18, September 25 (with Provost Stearns), and November 13
(with Sergei Andronikov, Director of Russian Programs
in the Provost s Office, and Anne Schiller, Associate Provost, International
Projects). A fourth meeting has been scheduled (with the Provost) on December
1.
At the semester s first
meeting of the Senate on September 9, the Provost provided a list of goals and
issues for AY2009-2010, including academic initiatives in Russia, Korea, and
Viet Nam, which are under the purview of the Academic Initiatives Committee.
Thus, our work has focused on these three programs. In addition, Committee
member Terry Zawacki is actively involved in the
planning of Access and
Bridge programs that deal with
English proficiency for, respectively, undergraduate and graduate, foreign
students. A memo on these programs from Terry to the Academic Initiatives
Committee is included as part of our report. A brief summary by country is
provided below.
2.0 Viet Nam: Provost
Stearns and Roger Stough, Vice President for Research
and Economic Development, are visiting Viet Nam for initial discussions during
Thanksgiving week. No plans have yet been developed.
2.1 Korea: Just as Mason
seeks to build strong international partnerships, governments and top
universities in the Asia-Pacific region also seek to extend their international
educational reach. South Korea is among the nations
most actively pursuing strategic partnerships with overseas institutions. Mason
s major Korea-related initiative at this time is the IFEZ Initiative, a
potential Mason branch campus in the Incheon Free
Economic Zone, located an hour by train from Seoul and promoted locally as only
3.5 hours to 1/3 of the world s population. The Korean government has created
the zone in an attempt to transform the area into a Northeast Asian logistics,
financial, business, and research and development hub that links Pacific Rim
economies with the Eurasian continent. Within IFEZ, Mason s interest is the
city of Songdo, which is being developed as an
international city and high value-added knowledge-based and information
business and industrial complex.
Mason is one of about nine
US and British institutions invited by the IFEZ Committee to consider planning
a branch campus in Songdo. The provosts of five US
schools have signed a cooperative agreement to explore such topics as shared
facilities and services and credit transfer. These other universities would
share a building with Mason on the Global University Campus. Planning and evaluation of the potential
branch campus opportunity is anticipated to begin in December, 2009. A market
survey will be conducted and carefully considered financial plan will follow.
Focus groups to solicit faculty input concerning factors that could influence
their interest in and ability to teach at Songdo will
be held and planning work groups convened. The evaluation process is expected
to extend over a period of eighteen months, and the Korean government will
provide a grant of one million dollars to support the planning process. No
formal commitments beyond the planning process have been made at this point.
2.2 Russia: 2.2.1 Two programs are being developed with institutions in
Russia. A rather modest graduate program that brings students from Russian
National University s Higher School of Economics to do research as part of
their master s degree. Starting in Fall 2010 Russian
students will study here, primarily in the fields of Economics, Sociology, and
Political Science.
2.2.2 The second Russian
program involving Moscow State University is much further developed and will
begin in January 2010. Sergei Andronikov, Director of
Russian Programs in the Provost s Office, has developed a detailed prospectus
for this dual-degree program which involves Russian professors coming to Mason
to teach Russian undergraduate students and the students then migrating
directly into Mason s School of Management and Department of Economics. A brief
overview of the program is given in the one-page summary entitled, “Dual Degree
Program between Moscow State University and George Mason University in B.S.
Economics and B.S. Management” which is included with this report.
Much more information is found in the document “Mason - MSU Academic Dual
Degree Program: Business Plan” dated June 1, 2009 which is also included as
part of this report.
This document contains a marketing plan,
operational plan, specifies the program s management and organization, and
contains a financial plan (now a bit dated given that the tuition has been
increased from $25,000 per year to $27,000 per year). Appendices to the
Business Plan (also included in our report) contain the Memorandum of
Understanding between Mason and Moscow State as well as information on the
academic requirements for the dual degree.
3.0 In summary, all these
foreign initiatives seek to increase foreign student enrollment at Mason, not
only to enhance diversity in the Mason community and open new opportunities for
research and academic collaboration, but also to generate increased out-of-state
tuition revenue. As recognized clearly in the SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses,
Opportunities, and Threats) Analysis on page 10 of the Business Plan for the
Mason-Moscow State program, there are significant difficulties to be overcome.
Given the goal of increasing out-of-state tuition revenue and the current
increasingly difficult economic situation for both the state and the
University, these programs require adequate enrollment to be economically
viable. The financial plan for the Mason-Moscow State initiative show the
projections for costs and revenues once the program is underway, i.e., the startup costs
are not included. Startup costs are substantial; for example, for the
Higher School of Economics program various administrators and faculty from
Economics, Sociology, and Political Science traveled to Russia. Although
information on these costs were requested from the
Provost s Office, none has been provided. On the revenue side, enrollment is a
critical parameter. For the first semester, an enrollment of 10 students from
Moscow state was predicted, but only six students are currently registered.
With the economic uncertainties both in Russia and the US and given the
University s budget constraints, the Academic Initiatives Committee recommends
that enrollment be regularly monitored in all these programs.
4.0 Finally, the Committee
thanks Anne Schiller and Sergei Andronikov for their
cooperation.