Agenda for the
Faculty Senate Meeting
January 21, 2009
Room B-113
Robinson Hall
3:00-4:15 p.m.
I. Call to Order
II. Approval of the Minutes of Nov. 19, 2008
III. Announcements
IV. New Business - Committee Reports
A. Senate
Standing Committees
Executive
Committee
Academic
Policies
Budget
& Resources
Faculty Retirement
Transition Leave Attachment
A
Faculty
Matters
Motion from
the committee Attachment
B
Nominations
Joe Scimecca is nominated to fill a vacancy on the Faculty Matters Committee
Organization
& Operations
B. Other Committees
V. Other New Business
VI. Remarks for the Good of the General
Faculty
VII. Adjournment
Attachment A
Purpose
The guidance
below is designed to assist Mason’s tenured faculty in transitioning from
full-time active service to retirement. The Faculty Retirement Transition Leave
guidance should be utilized by academic units as a management tool and a
strategic opportunity to address staffing needs within the academic unit. The
utilization of the process outlined below will be based on available funding at
the academic unit and staffing resources.
Eligibility for Participation:
Participants
must:
(Full-time
service may include periods of leave with full or partial pay, but not periods
of leave without pay);
Tier 1: 15 Years of Service:
Transition Option |
Impact |
One year, at full pay ˝ load Half-time
work can be achieved either by working full-time during one semester and not
working the other semester, or by working half –time both semesters in any
given academic year |
Compensation
will correspond to the option chosen and there is no impact on benefits |
Tier 2: 25 Years of service:
Transition Option |
Impact |
Two – years, at full pay, ˝ load Half-time
work can be achieved in both years either by working full-time during one semester
and not working the other semester, or by working half –time both semesters
in any given academic year. |
Compensation
will correspond to the option chosen and there is no impact on benefits |
OR |
|
One year at full pay, one course |
Compensation
will correspond to the option chosen and there is no impact on benefits |
Eligibility
Period:
Each November, eligible faculty may
apply to participate in the Faculty Retirement Transition Leave Program by
completing an election form and submitting the form to his/her Dean or
Director. The Dean or Director will make a recommendation to the Provost based
on student/faculty scheduling needs and finances available to the unit. The
Provost will then forward the form (whether approved or not approved) to Human
Resources. A Dean or Director making the recommendation not to approve the
election will communicate the decision and the reason for the decision to the
faculty member as well as to the Provost. An election form must be received by November 1 in any given year for
participation in the Faculty Retirement Transition Leave Program.
ATTACHMENT B
Motion from the
Faculty Matters Committee
A Proposal for the
Senate to Make an Annual Evaluation of the President and Provost
Introduction: The Faculty Senate currently conducts an annual evaluation in which the Faculty assesses the performance of the President, the Provost, and the Deans and Directors. While this assessment should be continued, it would also be useful to have the Senate conduct its own evaluation. Therefore the Faculty Matters Committee proposes the following motion:
Resolution: The elected members of the Faculty Senate
will conduct an annual evaluation of how effectively the President and Provost
have interacted with the Faculty Senate during the preceding academic
year. The results of this assessment
will be summarized in narrative form and sent to the General Faculty and to the
Board of Visitors. The Senate Chair and
the elected Faculty Representatives to the BOV will discuss the report with the
Board of Visitors.
Explanation: The Executive Committee will solicit input from the chairs of the Senate Standing Committees, as well as from ad hoc and University Committees that report to the Senate), and then compose a draft version of an annual assessment report of the President and the Provost. This draft report will be presented for discussion, amendment, and approval by the elected members of the Senate at its April meeting. The approved report will then be sent to the General Faculty and Board of Visitors as a separate mailing.
The assessment will include but not be limited to the following issues:
1) Has the Senate and its committees been provided access to the President, the Provost and their staffs in a timely manner?
2) Have the President, Provost and their staffs provided the Senate requested information in a timely manner?
3) In the case of joint Senate-Administration committees or task forces, have the President, Provost and/or their staffs participated in a collegial and effective manner?
4) Have the President, Provost and their staffs complied with the Faculty Handbook?
5) In policies involving the future of the University that have the potential to have significant impact upon the nature of the University or upon the Faculty and their work, has the Senate been included in the planning process in a significant way from the beginning?
Rationale: Because the General Faculty “delegates to the Faculty Senate the responsibility for participation in governance at the university level” (Handbook, 1.3.1), the Senate interacts regularly with the President and Provost regarding “all governance issues not internal to any single school or college” (Handbook, 1.3.2). Given this mandate, the Senate has both a unique need for effective relations with the chief administrative officers and a unique perspective upon how well these officers are collaborating with the Senate. Accordingly, it is appropriate that the Senate make a separate annual evaluation of how effectively the President, the Provost, and their staffs, have interacted with the Senate and that it share this information with the General Faculty, and with the members of the Board of Visitors. The overall goal of this procedure is to ensure that both the General Faculty and the Board gain an understanding of the Faculty Senate’s perception of cooperation between the George Mason Central Administration and the Senate.